The Marriage from Hell

Business

Promoted by

It all seemed perfect at the time. Documents signed and together we go blissfully off into the future. Yet sometimes, as little as a few months later, the wheels start to wobble followed by tears, acrimony and lawyers at 50 paces. Mergers & acquisitions of professional service firms are so often like marriages. The pain and suffering from a failed combination can be equal to any failed personal relationship. The consequences for the business and the owners may be devastating.

Promoted by Accounting Business Expo • 14 March 2018 • 4 minute read

Over the years I have assisted a variety of professional service firms demerge - A nice way of saying divorce. It is painful. It is expensive. It is disruptive to the business. Business relationships are often irreparably damaged. The personal toll on the participants is significant. Everyone else in the organisation is impacted from the lack of energy and distracted leadership team. It is certainly something to be avoided.

Some of the key factors in failed combinations include:

  1. The leaders are not on the same page.

    While the numbers might look good on paper indicating that the merger or acquisition will be a great financial outcome for all participants, people have to work well together. Different attitudes to spending money on practice development, to training & attending conferences, to salaries and employment to name just a few issues all create a difficult environment with distrust and angst. Working relationships can quickly disintegrate with one party feeling that the other is holding them back while the other feeling that their partner is being profligate. This is especially the case if the promised financial returns from the combination have not been realised. Care should be taken to ensure that financial outcomes are conservatively estimated.

  2. Differing professional standards

    While we like to think that the profession as a whole has high professional standards, the reality can sometime be quite different. Some practitioners may have struggled to keep up with their professional education. Other practitioners are more willing to test the boundaries. Unfortunately, some are just plain incompetent. This is a different type of hell. All of a sudden costs are being incurred as shoddy work is rectified. Difficult conversations are needed with clients. Trust goes out the window with work having to be reviewed incurring extra cost. It’s not all one way. Some practitioners may think that their new partner is too much of a stickler for accuracy and compliance leading to work being unprofitable. It is very hard to resolve such differences. If the transaction is an acquisition often the principal of the acquired practice will depart earlier as a way to resolving the differences. In a merger it’s a much more difficult matter to resolve. It is often an area which is overlooked in due diligence but it is a very important consideration.

  3. Stress for junior partner in transaction

    Not everyone can run the ship. For a sole practitioner who is used to doing their own thing merging into a larger firm can be a traumatic experience. It is easy to quickly feel disempowered and downcast as others start to tell you what to do, especially when you may not agree with the instructions. It can be quite a stressful environment. Clients must feel confident that they will not be adversely affected by the change, new processes and technologies have to be learnt while coping with new relationships and a foreign culture. Performance can suffer that add further to the stress and create a spiral of despair.

There are just a few of the factors leading to failure. To mitigate the risk effective due diligence is required exploring factors like professional standards, billing practices, processes in addition to finances, clients and employees (the name just a few).

Lots of discussions are needed to determine roles and accountability, agree standards and get to understand attitudes to expenditure, employee management and client engagement. Shareholder agreements need to be negotiated and agreed.

A well thought though combination can be that marriage made in heaven. Spending the time to ensure you don’t end up in the marriage from hell is time and money well spent. Cutting corners is not an option.

David Smith, the founder of Smithink, is external chairman, mentor and adviser to professional service firms. He will be presenting “How do buy a practice and not screw it up?” at Accounting Business Expo in Sydney on March 21, 22

<<Register your free ticket here.>>

 

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
You are not authorised to post comments.

Comments will undergo moderation before they get published.

search

OUR PLATFORMS AND BRANDS

EVENTS AND SUMMITS

MOMENTUM MARKETS NETWORK

LINKS

STAY CONNECTED

Get breaking news

OUR PLATFORMS AND BRANDS

EVENTS AND SUMMITS

PODCASTS

LEARNING AND EDUCATION

MOMENTUM MARKETS NETWORK

LINKS

CATEGORIES

STAY CONNECTED

Copyright © 2024 Accountants Daily